50.00

On the evening of March 29, 2025, Robert Vick was struck by another vehicle while proceeding through the intersection of 53rd Street and Raytown Road in Raytown, Missouri. Although there were no reported injuries, Robert stated that the other driver appeared to be heavily intoxicated, and begged him not to call the police. In an act of leniency, Robert agreed and no formal report was filed at the time of the accident. However, the collision caused clear vehicle damage, including a damaged front driver-side fender and misalignment issues on Robert’s 2007 Yukon XL Denali. Robert has retained extensive documentation, including photos of the other driver’s vehicle, driver’s license, and insurance card, as well as his own matching records. He has not yet had the vehicle fully assessed but confirmed the truck is driving unevenly and will require repairs. The driver who struck him admitted fault at the scene, and the positioning of the vehicles clearly supports Robert’s account of what happened. Robert is now seeking legal help to recover repair costs and potentially hold the other party accountable, especially given the implication of intoxicated driving and admitted fault. Despite initially choosing not to involve law enforcement, he appears organized and ready to proceed, making this a strong case for civil recovery based on negligence and property damage.

50.00

Loana Edmonds received a spinal pain stimulator implant in 2018, which was recently identified as part of an official medical device recall. She has since experienced worsening pain, functional complications, and overall decline in her condition, prompting her current doctor to recommend full removal of the implant. A corrective surgery is scheduled for April 14, 2025, with no confirmation yet as to whether her medical provider will cover the procedure’s cost. Loana is primarily interested in pursuing a product liability claim against the manufacturer of the recalled implant, citing physical suffering and disruption to her quality of life. While her doctor acknowledged the device must be removed due to its failure, she is still unsure whether the hospital or insurance will take responsibility for her medical expenses. She also confirmed that her device’s serial number matches one on the official recall list, providing a clear foundation for liability. She has preserved key documentation, including the original product packaging and recall details, which will help substantiate her claim. Loana appears cooperative and ready to proceed, and her situation presents a compelling case of manufacturer negligence with the potential for escalating medical costs and long-term damage. If the hospital declines coverage, additional liability concerns may extend to her care provider as well.

50.00

On March 16, 2025, Gregory Greer, a 71-year-old resident of Chicago, sustained injuries while attempting to board a CTA Bus #9 near 82nd Street and Ashland Avenue. According to Gregory, the bus was not lowered to accommodate boarding, causing him to trip and fall as he stepped up. He suffered a leg injury with visible bleeding, prompting the bus driver to immediately stop the vehicle, call a supervisor, and contact emergency services. Gregory was transported to Little Company of Mary Hospital for treatment and has retained medical documentation from the visit. As a result of the incident, Gregory reports both physical injury and property damage, including a broken phone and additional out-of-pocket costs. He has not received any reimbursement from the transit authority or insurance and is currently without reliable means of communication, relying on borrowed phones. He estimates $140 in emergency room expenses and approximately $200 ( but it's more likely that traditional hospital expenses would far exceed $4000 for Emergency care ) to replace the damaged phone. He also mentioned that the incident was officially reported and recorded by the bus operator, who witnessed his injuries and initiated the response. Gregory is seeking legal representation to explore options for filing a claim against the transit authority for negligence and failure to accommodate a safe boarding environment. With the bus driver as a potential witness, recorded surveillance, and hospital records supporting his account, this case presents a strong foundation for a public transit injury claim. Gregory is cooperative, detail-oriented, and open to attorney guidance on how to proceed.

50.00

On June 26, 2023, Willie McNell was involved in a serious vehicle accident on North Church Street in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, while driving his 1994 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 southbound. A truck pulled out in front of him, causing him to crash and total his vehicle. Although there was no direct contact between the vehicles, the maneuver forced Willie into an unavoidable collision. Police arrived approximately 5 to 10 minutes later, and a report was filed at the scene. Willie confirmed he obtained the at-fault party’s information and sought immediate medical attention. The incident resulted in multiple injuries and extensive losses. Willie reported approximately $100,000 in combined damages and medical expenses following the wreck. He emphasized the severity of the crash and the financial burden that has followed. He also stated that his vehicle was beyond repair and described the damage as total. This case involves strong elements of negligent driving by the opposing party, supported by a police report, documented injuries, and clear financial losses. Willie has retained all relevant documents and appears motivated to pursue legal action. His case presents a clear basis for pursuing compensation under North Carolina personal injury and liability laws, particularly given the scale of medical expenses and property loss.

200.00

On November 4, 2023, Harrison underwent a combined umbilical hernia repair and tummy tuck procedure at a Mayo Clinic-affiliated facility in Wisconsin. Within days of removing his bandages, he noticed signs of improper surgical execution, including a misaligned and jagged incision, insufficient removal of excess skin, and failure to reposition the belly button, which may have directly contributed to the rerupture of the hernia. He was later billed $5,000 for that complication alone and described the entire procedure as poorly and incompletely performed. Harrison attempted to address his concerns through the hospital’s Patient Experience department, explicitly requesting a refund and stating that he did not trust the original provider to perform a revision. However, the clinic declined his request on three separate occasions, each time deferring to the surgeon’s own self-assessment that “excellent care” had been provided. He has preserved a significant amount of evidence, including MyChart correspondence, messages with staff, and a large collection of photos and videos documenting the outcome. Harrison has found it difficult to secure legal representation locally, citing that many attorneys are unwilling to take on a case against a well-known institution. He is now actively seeking help from an attorney outside of his immediate region who is willing to pursue reimbursement and corrective justice for what he believes is a clear instance of surgical negligence and institutional failure.

1.00

Krista Smith was involved in a serious vehicle incident around 11:00 PM in October 2024 while driving her 2006 Ford Mustang on Highway 99 in Oroville, California. While traveling at approximately 65 mph, a driveline from a semi-truck suddenly detached and struck the front of her vehicle before becoming lodged underneath it. The impact blew out her tires and caused major undercarriage damage, rendering the car nearly totaled. The truck driver was reportedly unaware of the incident and continued driving. Following the crash, Krista experienced physical injuries and is now seeking coverage for medical expenses and lost wages related to the accident. No legal action was taken at the time of the incident, and no claim has yet been filed against the trucking company, despite the clear mechanical failure and unsafe conditions that led to the crash. She is actively pursuing her options for holding the commercial carrier accountable. This case presents strong potential for a commercial negligence claim, with evidence of mechanical failure leading to highway debris and physical harm to the claimant. The combination of property loss, personal injury, and financial hardship from missed work further strengthens the legal basis for pursuing compensation. Krista is seeking legal support to begin the claims process and recover damages tied to the accident.

200.00

On March 3, 2025, Damaris Vasquez underwent a scheduled hysterectomy at a hospital in Chattanooga, Tennessee, to remove fibroids, her uterus, and a fallopian tube. The procedure, which was supposed to last five hours, extended to over nine and a half hours after a surgical error led to her ureter being cut. This unexpected complication forced her into a second emergency surgery, required a blood transfusion, and she was later discharged with a catheter and the possibility of kidney damage due to the injury. She reports that one of the medical providers involved in her care verbally admitted that the injury was a mistake and acknowledged it as medical malpractice. Upon her discharge, Damaris received incomplete medical paperwork, omitting key surgical details and only listing routine medication notes. She currently has at least nine surgical incisions, continues to experience pain and emotional trauma, and has been left uncertain about her long-term recovery due to ongoing catheter use and delayed follow-up care. This case presents a compelling instance of surgical negligence, with a clear chain of events leading to physical harm, unnecessary procedures, and emotional distress, compounded by an explicit admission of fault. Damaris has retained her medical records, photographic evidence of her injuries, and details of those involved. She is seeking legal representation to hold the responsible parties accountable and ensure her experience is addressed appropriately under malpractice law.

50.00

Linda Parker called seeking legal assistance after suffering a workplace injury at McDonald’s in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. On October 28, 2024, she struck the top of her foot against a steel table, resulting in a diagnosed concussion on her foot and significant pain that now prevents her from wearing shoes comfortably. A procedure has been recommended by a foot specialist, and she continues to deal with the physical effects of the injury. Despite the severity of the incident, Linda received little to no guidance from her employer. She was never informed about COBRA or her rights under workers’ comp and had to file her claim independently. Although her medical bills were initially covered, she was later informed that her workers’ compensation provider would no longer assist her, leaving her without support. She’s now navigating the system alone, without a clear understanding of what steps to take next. At 66 years old, Linda has limited experience with technology and paperwork, yet she has managed to gather all relevant documentation related to her injury, including medical records and employer details. Her case reflects a broader issue of potential employer neglect and mismanagement of employee injury claims. She is actively looking for an attorney who can help her hold the responsible parties accountable and ensure she receives the care and compensation she deserves.

50.00

Glenn Eaton called GetAClaim after finding their number online. He’s looking to file a claim against Teva Pharmaceuticals, relating to opioid prescriptions he took over a six-year period, totaling more than 6,200 pills. The medications were dispensed by Activus, a company he says was under Teva. He has extensive medical and prescription records, including NDC numbers for four years of prescriptions from Osco Pharmacy, but lacks NDCs for an additional two years of prescriptions filled at Walgreens between 2011–2013. He remembers a brand switch during that time that prompted him to return to his doctor due to ineffectiveness. Glenn is 66 years old, managing multiple opioid-related claims, including successful filings against Endo and Purdue. He’s concerned about the complexity of the process, his limited computer skills, and difficulties with gathering certain documentation like NDC numbers or old pill bottles from Walgreens. He has medical records ready and is seeking help to ensure this Teva-related claim is submitted correctly.

1.00

test card

50.00

Case Summary: Alleged Medical Negligence Leading to Physical, Emotional, and Financial Harm On January 8, 2024, the patient underwent a mastectomy performed by the first doctor in Illinois. The procedure aimed to remove cancerous tissue but resulted in apparent negligence, as excess tissue was left behind. This oversight not only failed to address the intended medical issue but also caused significant disfigurement, necessitating a second surgery to restore the patient’s visual and structural appearance. The patient endured substantial emotional and mental distress due to the disfigurement and the extended recovery process. This has compounded the psychological challenges of coping with an initial cancer diagnosis and treatment. The situation has severely impacted her quality of life, contributing to a prolonged period of emotional suffering. Additionally, the patient experienced financial hardship as the estimated cost of the corrective surgery ranges between $60,000 and $80,000. This financial burden has further strained her well-being. Compounding this, she lost her job as a result of the time she had to step away for the initial procedure, the follow-up corrective surgery, and the recovery periods. This loss of income has significantly increased the financial and emotional toll on her and her family. The patient has gathered substantial evidence to support her claims, including photographs documenting the results of the first procedure and the subsequent disfigurement, as well as medical records and other relevant documentation. These materials clearly illustrate the inadequacy of the initial surgical outcome and its aftermath. This case represents a multifaceted issue involving physical harm, psychological distress, and financial loss. It warrants careful legal evaluation to determine the appropriate course of action for holding the responsible parties accountable and seeking fair compensation for the damages incurred.

28.00

Affiliate Testing Card

88.00

Affiliate Card Test